Book: Dumbing Us Down: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling
Authors: John Taylor Gatto
Length: 106 pages
Published by: New Society Publishers, USA
Year of publication: 1992
The foreword for this non-fiction controversy, by Thomas
Moore is enough to tell us about the author; John Taylor Gatto. Moore describes
Gatto as his and his father’s inspiration. Gatto an award winning teacher,
first worked as a copywriter and it would be interesting for you to read for yourselves
what prompted him into school teaching. It is surprising in this case, firstly,
that Gatto dedicated the book to his daughter and granddaughter instead of a
student or teacher, as usually would have been, coming from a teacher, and
secondly that the book is a strict criticism on the schooling system and the
fact that it has been made compulsory.
‘…It should be seen as a book that wrote itself’ Gatto
reveals in the acknowledgments section.
All 5 chapters of this book are based off Gatto’s learning experiences,
speeches or articles. They raise important questions and reveal shocking truths
about schooling. Such as the fact that school does not teach a subject, instead
it teaches 7 problematic lessons, the most disturbing of which are confusion,
indifference, and emotional and intellectual dependency. Gatto goes on to say
that teaching is not the task of one individual or institution, he emphasizes
on the importance of non-certified teachers and that I believe comes from the
idea that every person, place, animal or thing has the potential to teach as
long as the learner is interested. One of his rather mind blowing view is that
television is only another mode of schooling. Between school and tv children
get little time to actually ‘learn’ something worthwhile, which Gatto believes
is only possible in families and communities. This is where it gets really
interesting because hereafter Gatto draws a definitive line between
‘communities’ and ‘networks’ saying that there is no place for the weak in the
latter and that a network is extremely materialistic and opportunistic.
Schools, he says, may develop a network to some extent but not a community.
Up till now I found the book surprising but agreeable, but
there was one point I just could not get myself to accept. Gatto thinks that
law enforcement should not be there to control the people, he advocates for
freedom, even from the law. Arguing that people’s own conscience should be
developed enough to stop them from crime. I disagree because ideally it is not
possible for every individual in the society to be as morally high as that. But
of course, it is up to the reader to read and interpret for himself the meaning
he wants to.
Other than that I liked the matter of fact way of writing.
Though the text was supported by facts and historical evidence, Gatto did not
take many pages to explain his very controversial points, which I think had all
the more effect on the reader. For me the referencing was a bit difficult to
understand as the book was purely written in American context and as he is,
Gatto did not explain the references either. This I believe, could have been
better.
I would recommend this book to homeschooling parents, those
thinking about of homeschooling, and especially those who have a bias against
the ideology. However, children going to school should not read it as it might
influence their views about their teachers, parents and schools, all three of
which deserve a lot of respect whether or not they do their job well.
Dear Azka,
ReplyDeleteThis review ignites our curiosity to read the book in depth and this is the success of any book review.
I loved the fact that you didn't hesitate to disagree with the writer and put forth your own opinion unapologetically
Way to go girl.
Godspeed,
Bela
Jazzakallah for the wonderful comment Bela. ❤
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete